myverdict

myverdict replied to the topic Extreme Links — HELP in the forum Expert Help 5 years, 11 months ago

Hi Mike,

Thanks a lot for these explanations. I was struggling a bit with this section, but I am now clear on the areas I was having difficulty understanding.

Thank you,

Sandhya Reddy

Log in
myverdict posted an update 5 years, 12 months ago

Anybody in the Minnesota area (Plymouth) interested in studying together for LSAT?

Log in
myverdict replied to the topic The Table of Common Notations – Page 206 & 370 in the forum Ask Mike Kim 5 years, 12 months ago

Hi Mike,

Thanks for the clarification. Also, just thought of informing you that the similar error seems to be on the “Diagramming Logic Games” quick review PDF.

Thanks,

Sandhya Reddy

Log in
myverdict started the topic The Table of Common Notations – Page 206 & 370 in the forum Ask Mike Kim 5 years, 12 months ago

Hi Mike,

While going through the table of common notations, I noticed a small discrepancy.

On page 206: for “F is at least 2 spots ahead of G” or “G is at least 2 spots after F” – the notation is F __ …G
whereas on page 370 for the same rule – the notation is F __ __ …G

This discrepancy is confusing me a lot. Please clarify.

Regards,

Sandhya Reddy

Log in
myverdict replied to the topic Lesson 15: Set 4, part 1, Q1 – A consultant visits five different sites… in the forum Ask Mike Kim 6 years ago

Hi Mike,

Yay!! I got it. i understood where I took a different track.

Thanks,

Sandhya

Log in
myverdict started the topic Lesson 15: Set 4, part 1, Q1 – A consultant visits five different sites… in the forum Ask Mike Kim 6 years ago

Hi Mike,

I am nearing the finish of the first part of the logic games section (Lesson 15: Diagramming Review). I am unable to understand the Set 4, part 1, Q1 answer (A) She visited N third.

I felt that either one of (A) or (E) could be the answer. But I am not able to rule out (E) totally. Considering P to be last, the answer could go something like this in my view:

M/N Os Ms/Ns Rs…Read More

Log in
myverdict replied to the topic Chapter 6 – LR – a piece ≠ the puzzle in the forum Ask Mike Kim 6 years, 1 month ago

Hi Mike,

Yeah I am from India. I now understand that the phrase was an idiomatic expression. Thanks for the clarification.

Sandhya

Log in
myverdict started the topic Chapter 6 – LR – a piece ≠ the puzzle in the forum Ask Mike Kim 6 years, 1 month ago

Hi Mike,

I have just recently started focusing more on LSAT and have started taking the LSAT seriously. I plan to give the exam on December 3, 2016. I am in the incompetent phase right now, having low confidence as well, so please don’t mind me asking this question. I know the question may sound absurd but it is more of a clarification. In the lsat trainer, you elaborated the category of…Read More

Log in
myverdict became a registered member 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in

@myverdict