cecily

cecily replied to the topic How to approach newer, more challenging LG in the forum Expert Help 3 years, 6 months ago

Oh my goodness, thank you so much, Mike!! That is all super helpful as I start studying. I know there’s no way I can anticipate a particularly challenging game but this is a really helpful approach. Thanks!

Log in

cecily started the topic How to approach newer, more challenging LG in the forum Expert Help 3 years, 6 months ago

I’m planning on taking the LSAT for the third time in June. First score was a 164, second time (this past September) I canceled because I didn’t think I did better. Prior to this I was testing around 170.

I’m wondering if there is anyway to prepare for the newer, more challenging (to me anyway!) logic games that seem to be becoming more frequent, such as the office game on the December…Read More

Log in

cecily replied to the topic Confuses sufficient and necessary conditions in the forum General Discussion 3 years, 11 months ago

Yes that helps so much! So just to clarify, the correct answer to that problem would be like the argument confuses sufficient for necessary?

Log in

cecily started the topic Confuses sufficient and necessary conditions in the forum General Discussion 3 years, 11 months ago

I’m having a lot of trouble with answer choices that have some variation of this answer:

PT 66, section 2, number 11. confuses… “a condition necessary for a phenomenon and one that is sufficient to it.”

I often find it hard to figure out what this means when applied to the question. Is there an easier way to attack questions that have answers like this, and the reverse–which I guess…Read More

Log in

cecily replied to the topic Logic Games–CANNOT be true in the forum General Discussion 4 years ago

Okay, that makes a lot of sense. For some reason I had this idea in my head that you shouldn’t jump around on the questions, but it sounds like that makes it way easier. Thanks!

Log in

cecily replied to the topic Logic Games–CANNOT be true in the forum General Discussion 4 years ago

Ah gotcha. That is helpful, and kind of what I was assuming, but wasn’t sure if I was just going about it totally the wrong way. Thank you!

Log in

cecily replied to the topic Logic Games–CANNOT be true in the forum General Discussion 4 years ago

Sure–so one of the ones I was thinking of was Game 2 on PT 31, the used/new CDs game. I’m looking at the explanation in the Trainer for number 10, but I’m still confused. Is the process that you just have to test them all out and eliminate all of them one by one, unless there’s one that just stands out? Thank you!

Log in

cecily started the topic Logic Games–CANNOT be true in the forum General Discussion 4 years ago

Hi Mike (and others)!

I’m studying for a retake (first test was 164) and the LSAT Trainer, which I didn’t use before, has been super helpful this time around, and this website is great, so thank you!

I’m struggling with the “CANNOT be true” LG questions at the moment. I’m working through the book and doing drills and stuff, and I had used the PowerScore books the first time around so I…Read More

Log in

@cecily