LR 34.3.5 A democratic society cannot exist–Negation question

    • April 5, 2016 at 9:37 am #1662
      ahuja923
      Participant

      Hi all,

      I wanted to have a discussion¬†on negation for required assumption questions. At the time of taking this test, I narrowed down the answers to A and D. Both seemed to go at the flaw I had identified in my head. From there i went to the negation test to see which one would destroy the argument. I went with A because I had negated the statement incorrectly, and in doing so I thought it was the stronger negation that “destroyed” the original argument. In retrospect, I realize that A is likely overkill for a R.A. question, and is more likely a S.A. type of answer.

      My negation of A only negated term “unable” but failed to negate the term “anyone”: Anyone who relies on movies and electronic media for entertainment is able to form a strong bond of mutual trust with a citizen. In this form, it seems pretty damaging to the argument and therefore I chose it. Obviously, I should have started that out with “some people who rely on…”

       

      After that long build up, I’m curious to know which parts of a sentence are ones that I must negate? I think normally it’s pretty obvious, but this seems like the first time I’ve run into a situation where I’ve had to negate two parts of the sentence. Any tips on how to catch these sorts of things in the future?

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.