

January 30, 2016 at 1:10 pm #1464Mike KimKeymaster
Danny Pearlberg has done something pretty amazing—he’s quickly put together solutions for the ENTIRE Dec. 2015 exam, in time to be of use to those of you who may be using this exam as one of your final PT’s before the February test. A huge thanks to Danny, and I hope you all find it useful —
Here’s the link:

February 8, 2016 at 11:27 am #1504taratutorParticipant
This is game 4 solutions for the December LSAT. I know Danny posted some in his post, but here is another way to setup/attack game 4 that you guys might find useful! This game was a defined grouping game that if set up correctly was not too difficult, but the way the game starts out it might lead you into a different set up.
First we have 5 volunteers H, J, K, M and N being assigned to 3 committees, X, Y, Z and then these volunteers will each hold a position on the committee L, S, T
The basic set up for the game is:
Not:
You do not want to put the positions held as a static variable, because then you cannot add a volunteer onto a committee unless you know their position. And it is possible you won’t know there position but you will know which committee they are on so you want to leave the option open to record that.
The rules for the game are:
If N —> N = L
M = exactly 1 committee
K = Y and ~Z
J = Ys and ~X and ~Z
So when you plug the original deductions into your diagram it should look like this so far:
But now that you know J and K cannot be in Z that means the remaining 3 volunteers H, M and N have to be in Z. And since N is there, N has to be the leader.
And since M can be used only once, we now know there is no M in X and Y.
This means there is no J and no M on committee X, so that means N, H and K must be on committee X, with N being the leader again.
So that leaves either H or N being on committee Y, with most of the positions remaining unknown. However, just note that if we knew N was on committee Y, since N is always the leader we would be able to deduce that K would have to be T, but since H/N could be there we can’t make any further deductions.
Your final diagram should look like:
QUESTIONS:
18. For committee Z we know it is made up of N, M, and H, with N being the secretary. So quickly scan to see if an answer has those 3 and has N being the leader. Only choice E has this. So E is correct and then we can quickly move on.
19. If K is the T for two committees that means K is the T for committee X and committee Y. If you add that into your diagram and make your deductions you will see that H has to be the S for committee X since all the other positions are now filled, And that the remaining H/N in committee Y is the L. and then committee Z is unchanged.
Your diagram should look like:
This means that each of the following could be true except: C – because H cannot be the treasurer of X, as you can see from our diagram H must be the S for committee X
20. Must be true except means: we should be able to figure out the answer by looking at our original deductions. By looking at the answers this leaves us with B. H does not have to be assigning to Y. It is possible H is assigned to Y, but it is also possible that spot could be filled by N. That means this B does not have to be true.
21. If K is going to be the leader for one of the committees that committee has to be Y, because the only other committee that K is on is committee X, and N is already the leader for the committee. So if K is the leader for committee Y that means the last volunteer on the committee has to now become H, because if it was N then N would need to be the leader, but the leader position is now being filled by K.
Our diagram should now look like:
So the amount of positions is fully determined for B only committee Y, as you can see from the diagram. We still do not know the positions of the other committees.
22. To know what type of answer we need to find for determining the positions of everyone on every committee we need to think strategically. First off, we don’t know if committee Y has H or N, so we would need an answer that would force one of them on committee Y. Also, if we knew one more persons position on each committee we could figure out the third position by process of elimination and solve the whole game. So we need to see which answer does that.
A) H is the leader for one committee. This forced H to be the leader of Y and then we would know K is the T for committee Y, but we still would have no idea of the positions of the other people on committee X and Z. So this answer is out.
B) H is the secretary for two committees, well H could be the S for X and Z and then we would have no idea still if H was on committee Y or if N was. So this answer is out.
C) H is the treasurer for all three committees. This means H is on committee Y and is the T, so then K becomes the L. And since H is the T on X, that means K now becomes the S on X. And since H is the T on Z, that means M is the S on Z, so we would know everyone’s role. This is the right answer! Your diagram would look like:
D) K is the T for two committees would give us the same diagram as #19, and as we can see we still had a lot unknown. So this answer is out.</span>
E) Nash is the leader for all three. Means N is the L on Y as well so K would be the T, but we would not know the roles of the volunteers on the other committees still so then this answer is out too.
23. This is the substitute a rule question. It tells us that we need to find a new rule that could replace the rule stating that M is only assigned to one committee. So to figure out how to replace it we need to consider how this rule affected our original diagram. Since we figured out that M was on committee Z by default, because K and H couldn’t be there, we would need a rule that would force M not to be on committee X and Y.
A) H is on more committees than M. Well this would leave the possibility open that M could go on two committees since it is possible H is on all 3. This would change our game so A is out.
B) J must be on more committees than M. J can only be on one committee, so that would mean M would have to be on 0, which would change our original game as well, so B is out.
C) K must be on more committees than M. Well K must be on 2 and can only be on 2, since K cannot go on Z, so then that would force M to only go once or 0, but M cannot go 0 anyways because M gets forced onto committee Z, so this works!
D) M must be on more committees than H. This is out because H goes 23 times! and M can’t go more than that! M needs to go only once.
E) Nash must be assigned to more committees than M. N goes 23 times, so once again this would make it possible for M to go 12 times, which would be too many! So this answer is out as well.
I hope that made the game seem a little easier for everyone!!!

February 8, 2016 at 2:57 pm #1505Mike KimKeymaster
awesome – thanks so much Tara for adding your solution! If you don’t mind, it’d be great if you also added it to the comments section of the article itself — this forum thread will likely get buried at some point, but the article itself will remain prominent — I’m sure those looking up the solutions at a later point would love to see multiple ways to approach the q’s — Mike

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.