Reply To: PT 64 section 3 #19

June 10, 2016 at 6:51 am #1978
Mike Kim

Yeah, I think you can definitely see it that way — the author is jumping from a fact about there being less waste using biological catalysts to saying that thus disposing of that waste will be less expensive. In making that leap, the author is assuming that the waste produced is comparable (like apples to apples) but maybe it’s not — maybe the biological catalysts create less waste, but it happens  to be more toxic and more expensive to dispose of — and (D) addresses that issue — HTH — MK